Perplexity's Dilemma: Where Does AI Search Draw the Line?

When Perplexity first launched, my honest reaction was: we could build this. With a capable team and enough runway, the core tech isn’t the moat. Semantic search + LLM synthesis isn’t some secret sauce that only one company can possess.

What’s actually hard — and what Perplexity is now discovering — is the position. They’re caught between two gravitational pulls. On one side: the expectation of being the next-generation search paradigm. On the other: a growing coalition of content publishers (Forbes, Dow Jones, and now the New York Times legally suing for copyright infringement) pushing back hard.

The whole industry is simultaneously trying to figure out where AI search ends and content theft begins. There’s no consensus yet — just litigation and negotiation.

What I’m most curious about: can Perplexity find a deal structure that makes publishers, users, and themselves feel it’s fair? If they do, this legal pressure becomes a competitive advantage — a cleared runway others don’t have. If they can’t, it’s a ceiling with no way through.

📰 Reuters: New York Times sues Perplexity AI for copyright infringement

💬 Read more: 2025 Year in Review (English)