← Back to Insights

China Locks Down AI Talent: Alibaba and DeepSeek Researchers Need Exit Permits

Nils Liu
China AI Policy Geopolitics DeepSeek News

TL;DR

Beijing is now controlling when top AI talent at private firms like Alibaba and DeepSeek can leave the country. The US restricted chips; China is restricting people.

China Locks Down AI Talent: Alibaba and DeepSeek Researchers Need Exit Permits

On May 26, Bloomberg reported that the Chinese government is now requiring senior AI researchers at private companies, including Alibaba and DeepSeek, to obtain official approval before traveling abroad.

The policy has been running quietly for six months. DeepSeek executives faced similar restrictions in December 2025. Two co-founders of Manus, a Chinese AI startup, were also barred from overseas travel. What began as individual cases has now expanded to the entire private AI industry.

Who Is Affected and How It Works

The restrictions target “individuals involved in advanced AI systems considered strategically important,” including founders, senior researchers, and executives.

Enforcement operates through administrative pressure rather than any publicly disclosed legal framework. There is no formal ban. Affected personnel must report to relevant authorities before departing and wait for clearance. Neither Alibaba nor DeepSeek commented on Bloomberg’s report.

Beijing’s Calculation

Beijing now treats top AI talent as a national security asset, placing them in the same category as nuclear scientists and senior executives at state-owned enterprises, both of which have long faced exit controls. Extending this to private-sector tech researchers marks a meaningful escalation in scope.

The reasoning is straightforward: AI’s core competitive advantage lives in people. Training methodologies, architecture decisions, and data pipeline details reside in researchers’ heads, not in exportable hardware. US chip export controls built walls around silicon. China’s equivalent countermeasure locks in the people.

The Likely Consequences

Brain drain risk is real. Researchers who want to present at international conferences, accept overseas invitations, or simply maintain professional mobility now operate in a higher-uncertainty environment. Singapore, the UAE, and the UK have emerged as likely exit points for those who want to relocate before restrictions tighten further.

For Western AI labs, this policy creates an unintended recruiting advantage. OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind are competing for researchers who now factor in not just salary and research quality but a personal risk calculation: whether leaving means not being able to return. For those already working outside China or willing to relocate, the incentive to stay abroad grows stronger.

Short-term, the restrictions cut off Chinese domestic frontier research from some of the knowledge flows that helped DeepSeek and Alibaba close the gap with Western labs in the first place. International conferences, cross-border academic collaborations, open-source contributions — restricting people movement also restricts information movement.

The Pattern

This fits a broader escalation: China’s export controls on rare earth minerals, limits on semiconductor manufacturing tools. The AI competition is expanding beyond hardware. The next question is enforcement intensity. The policy exists; what remains unknown is the approval rate, how many researchers have actually been blocked, and where exactly the threshold is. Deliberately vague rules have their own effect: they make everyone uncertain about the redline.

If this was useful, subscribe to the newsletter for weekly AI PM insights and GenAI case studies.


Sources:

Related reading:

Get the latest insights

Join the newsletter to receive my latest articles on GenAI, AI Agents, and architecture.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.