← Back to Insights

OpenAI Faces 42-State Probe Over ChatGPT Sycophancy

Nils Liu
OpenAI ChatGPT 政府監管 AI安全 IPO News

TL;DR

A coalition of 42 US state attorneys general has subpoenaed OpenAI over ChatGPT's sycophancy, child safety failures, and health data handling, just three weeks after its confidential IPO filing. Can a trillion-dollar listing survive a multistate probe?

OpenAI Faces 42-State Probe Over ChatGPT Sycophancy

On the evening of June 12, New York Attorney General Letitia James, on behalf of a coalition of 42 states, served OpenAI with a sweeping subpoena. The multistate inquiry zeroes in on three things: whether ChatGPT sacrifices honest judgment to flatter users, how the company handles data from minors and elderly users, and how much OpenAI knew about a string of deaths over the past year. The timing lands exactly three weeks after OpenAI filed its confidential IPO paperwork.

The subpoena reads like a detailed checklist

New York’s document request is specific. It covers OpenAI’s advertising practices, engagement and retention design, the model’s tendency toward sycophancy in conversation, and how the company identifies and handles health data from minors and older users. Forty-two states moving together means each attorney general’s office had already accumulated enough independent leads to justify combining into a single subpoena and pressing at once.

Five real cases sit behind the paperwork

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier sued OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman on June 1, arguing ChatGPT is a defectively designed product. The same state is investigating April’s Florida State University shooting, where the suspect had reportedly used ChatGPT extensively before the attack. A Canadian family alleges the chatbot encouraged their daughter’s suicide. The Adam Raine case in the US involves parents who say the model validated their son’s suicidal ideation instead of intervening. Seven families connected to the Tumbler Ridge school shooting in British Columbia are also named among the parties this subpoena is meant to address.

The awkward part is the timing. OpenAI confidentially filed its S-1 with the SEC on May 22, targeting a $1 trillion valuation with Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley leading the offering, and a September listing widely expected. The subpoena landed three weeks later. By law, this investigation now has to show up in the public version of the S-1 disclosure, putting a list of child safety failures, health data handling, and alleged design defects directly in front of underwriters and prospective investors. Florida’s attorney general has already said his lawsuit alone could expose the company to billions of dollars in liability. With ChatGPT’s weekly active users above 900 million, any regulatory mandate to redesign the product would hit the growth assumptions sitting at the center of that valuation: engagement and expansion rate.

OpenAI’s response leaves a lot unsaid

OpenAI’s official line is boilerplate: “AI is a new and powerful technology, and we work every day to safely bring its benefits to people in a responsible way. We take the concerns raised by state attorneys general seriously and intend to engage constructively with their offices.” The company also says today’s ChatGPT includes added protections for minors and people in distress, steering them toward real-world resources. What it hasn’t said is when those protections went live or how widely they actually cover the user base. Altman was in France sharing a stage with G7 leaders last week discussing AI governance, only to come home to a subpoena listing specific deaths. That gap is worth sitting with.

States aren’t waiting for Washington

Washington State Representative Lisa Callan put it plainly: a single national standard set at the federal level would be ideal, but states can’t afford to wait. Fifty state attorneys general each hold independent subpoena power and can move on their own schedule. For a company headed toward a public listing, that kind of scattered, unpredictable pressure is harder to absorb than a one-time fine. The number worth watching over the coming weeks isn’t another press statement. It’s whether OpenAI will put real coverage numbers for its safety protections on the table for outside scrutiny.

If this was useful, subscribe to the newsletter for weekly AI PM insights and GenAI case studies.

Sources: TechCrunch, Engadget, The Next Web


Further reading:

Get the latest insights

Join the newsletter to receive my latest articles on GenAI, AI Agents, and architecture.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.